Singularity RPG Moderators (
singularitymods) wrote in
singularityooc2012-03-16 06:45 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
MOD ANNOUNCEMENT -- AC POLICY
First, this is a reminder that Activity Check begins in two weeks on April 1st, so now is the time to start rounding up posts, or make them if you're falling short. AC is one network or log post with comments, or 15 comments in another person's post. For this round all activity since moving to DW counts, so we don't anticipate any reasonably active players having trouble with it. Characters accepted in March are exempt.
Currently, we have a lenient activity check, and we loosened it even more for the move, in anticipation of complications which, happily, didn't occur. Our AC schedule worked just fine when we were a smaller, slower game, but that's no longer the case. Space Prom went to 3,000 comments in a week, and we are facing the fact that our little game is all grown up and ready to borrow the keys and wreck the car.
We have no intention of instituting an unreasonable AC, but we do need to make it more stringent to keep inactive players from affecting their casts and other CR, and there is plenty of room to tighten things up without AC becoming unmanageable. We are currently leaning toward keeping AC bimonthly, but increasing the total number of posts/comments required, probably with a mix-'n'-match system that will accommodate various play styles. However, we'd like your input before making any changes, hence this post. What would you like to see out of a new AC policy? What would you not like to see? We know people would like to have a purge list posted at the end of the AC period. Anything else?
Any changes will not affect this AC round.
Currently, we have a lenient activity check, and we loosened it even more for the move, in anticipation of complications which, happily, didn't occur. Our AC schedule worked just fine when we were a smaller, slower game, but that's no longer the case. Space Prom went to 3,000 comments in a week, and we are facing the fact that our little game is all grown up and ready to borrow the keys and wreck the car.
We have no intention of instituting an unreasonable AC, but we do need to make it more stringent to keep inactive players from affecting their casts and other CR, and there is plenty of room to tighten things up without AC becoming unmanageable. We are currently leaning toward keeping AC bimonthly, but increasing the total number of posts/comments required, probably with a mix-'n'-match system that will accommodate various play styles. However, we'd like your input before making any changes, hence this post. What would you like to see out of a new AC policy? What would you not like to see? We know people would like to have a purge list posted at the end of the AC period. Anything else?
Any changes will not affect this AC round.
no subject
As far as AC, I'd really hate to see more than two posts/logs in two months required, though I'd be okay with something like three pieces of activity that can be post/log/comments. Just as long as they don't have to all be posts.
no subject
Seconding(?) the not increasing post count, but possibly increasing pieces of activity like comments.
no subject
+increasing entry number => I sometimes have problems thinking of posts on my own, but I find it easier to have characters respond to something happening than be directly posting to the network (esp with CT, who's not likely to post to the network pretty much at all, but will respond to thinks that interest her). I think the 15 comments ob someone else's entry is a great avenue for those kinds of characters.
+strict weekly activity => Again, I know Sing doesn't do this, but I've been in a game with a strict you must have this many consecutive comments in a week so if I had a bad week or was running slower for any reason, I had to call. Iatus for anything. I think a monthly AC is a good standard across the board with grace if someone had a particularly shitty/busy month.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
My preference is just that the required activity isn't one specific type, i.e. one post and one log per AC period, since some characters either don't want to post to the network or don't have much to say, but are still active through comments. I think if we stick with bimonthly, at the very least the amount of activity should probably be doubled (i.e. two posts/two logs/two 15-comment threads/any mix of those per AC period), but so long as there are options I'm not too concerned with any particular breakdown.
no subject
Though as long as it's no more than two things every other month, I think it would still be fine, especially if it doesn't have to be posts.
ALSO THIRDING THE PURGE POST.
no subject
My personal preference as a player falls in line with keeping it bimonthly with about 2-3 things of mix-and-match, so definitely some mod agreement here on that feeling!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Yes, purge list please. Especially with both character name and journal name.
no subject
no subject
As the player of a jerk character, there are times when my entire goal is to get the other guy to hang up in about ten comments or less, and those threads would not, technically, even count toward present AC requirements (15 each = 30 comments in a 'perfect', ideal AC-clearing thread).
Otherwise, I'm cool with the things as presented.
The purge list is a great idea!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Also, I'm good with things being bimonthly with multiple things as well. I just have a question: does the 15+ comments apply to both log and network comments?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
As for the AC...I think that if you're increasing the amount of activity required, making it possible to mix and match things would allow for greater flexibility with everyone's RPing styles.
Keeping the two-month period and increasing the amount of posts/logs/threads seems like it might also work best for people who tag at a more leisurely pace.
no subject
All of this right here.
<3
no subject
I'm okay with keeping it bimonthly and increasing the total number of posts/comments required as long as we can still mix and match threads to an extent to get the right number of comments. (I honestly didn't realize we could do that and I think it is wonderful since I have so much trouble trying to drag comment threads out to hit 15.)
And a purge list is a great idea.
no subject
no subject
I could easily see doubling the AC, mix and match. Would be easy still, but at the same time, would mean it's harder to drift through AC. (Actually, wouldn't care if it were tripled, personally, with it bimonthly but that's me. Currently have 3 characters in a monthly 2 post AC game as well as my 2 here.)
no subject
no subject
And I'm fine with an increase in required activity over two months so long as we still have the option to mix and match. Slightly more stringent AC seems perfectly reasonable to me.
no subject
I have thought for a while that the requirements are a little too lenient for a bimonthly check so yeah, upping the requirements a little is fine by me as long as we can still mix and match.
I like not having to stress out about it if I go through an off period too, though, which is why it's great that it is bimonthly.
no subject
No but seriously, purge list and bimonthly multi-thread requirements sounds good :|b
no subject
PEN FOR GAME PRESIDENT!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
as for the AC requirements. what I love about sing's AC is the fact that it has bimonthly activity check, which somehow is more managable for me. like someone up there said, it allows you to have some days / weeks off in the AC period without having to stress about making the AC. perfectly up for raising the requirements to 3 pieces of mix-'n'-match activity. as I understand it it doesn't have to be just three but could be 5 pieces of AC just so that the amount of comments sums up to the requirement? that's something that should clear in how the requirements on the AC page are worded. perhaps it should just say how many comments over all there need to be, that they need to be from three different links and for how many comments a network post counts? if ... that makes sense. x_x
no subject
Oh here's 4 options
> a network entry
> a log entry
> participation in a log (15< comments belonging to you)
> participation in a network entry (15< comments belonging to you)
Use two of those to prove you've been active since the last AC and you're good.
Or a monthly one with 1 of those 4 as proof of AC, since it pretty much amounts to the same thing anyway.
Those seem like the easiest solutions to me.
no subject
no subject