http://singularitymods.livejournal.com/ (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
singularitymods.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
singularityooc2011-12-26 03:14 am
singularitymods.livejournal.com) wrote in singularityooc2011-12-26 03:14 am
Entry tags:
MOD ANNOUNCEMENT -- LIVEJOURNAL VS DREAMWIDTH DISCUSSION
In light of the recent changes to LJ's user interface, we feel that it's time to have a discussion about the potential of moving Singularity from LJ to Dreamwidth, a journaling service that is a fork of earlier LJ code. Of course we mods have our opinions, but we would like to hear our players' thoughts before making a decision.
We're aware that either option will make some players unhappy, so please be careful to keep this a discussion and not an argument.
Some information to consider: LJ will not be rolling back the changes made with Release 88. See the proposed new site design here and the![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
lj_releases post about R88 bug fixes and future design plans here. (That link goes to a comment explaining that subject lines are gone forever in default comment pages.) LJ is planning to offer an S2 style that mimics the old S1 style within a few weeks. Not directly related to R88, but definitely something that should be part of the discussion is that LJ has had some questionable dealings with users. The linked post is very anti-LJ, but we provided it despite a lack of neutrality because it has a great deal of factual information on how LJ deals with its users.
Dreamwidth was founded in 2009 after some LJ users became concerned with how LJ was interacting with customers, resulting in a less-commercial set of operating principles than LJ. They will be implementing community imports within the next few weeks (scroll down), and description of the RP-relevant differences between LJ and DW is available here.
Edit: If you can't comment because of the style changes to LJ, please feel free either to contact the mods through another channel, or ask another player to post on your behalf. Just make sure it's clear who's speaking, please.
Edit 2: Son of Edit: If you're having difficulty loading the page, appending
We're aware that either option will make some players unhappy, so please be careful to keep this a discussion and not an argument.
Some information to consider: LJ will not be rolling back the changes made with Release 88. See the proposed new site design here and the
lj_releases post about R88 bug fixes and future design plans here. (That link goes to a comment explaining that subject lines are gone forever in default comment pages.) LJ is planning to offer an S2 style that mimics the old S1 style within a few weeks. Not directly related to R88, but definitely something that should be part of the discussion is that LJ has had some questionable dealings with users. The linked post is very anti-LJ, but we provided it despite a lack of neutrality because it has a great deal of factual information on how LJ deals with its users.Dreamwidth was founded in 2009 after some LJ users became concerned with how LJ was interacting with customers, resulting in a less-commercial set of operating principles than LJ. They will be implementing community imports within the next few weeks (scroll down), and description of the RP-relevant differences between LJ and DW is available here.
Edit: If you can't comment because of the style changes to LJ, please feel free either to contact the mods through another channel, or ask another player to post on your behalf. Just make sure it's clear who's speaking, please.
Edit 2: Son of Edit: If you're having difficulty loading the page, appending
?format=light to the end of the URL has helped some people.
no subject
no subject
no subject
BUT YES /zips lips
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
/in wrong journal /gives no fucksno subject